<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The best bang for your hardware buck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/</link>
	<description>Forging new Alliances daily</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Super Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-33334</link>
		<dc:creator>Super Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-33334</guid>
		<description>I just got SupCom and my computer can't play it. I have a Gateway Vista thats not bad, but I need a better video card that can play SupCom, thats all. It's the only game I have that it can't play, and my computer keeps telling me I need a new video card. I'm still young and don't know a hole lot about computers like you people do and was wondering what kind of Video Card I can get that at least not glich when you play SupCom. I don't have too bad of a income. whats your sugjestion? My parents didn't grow up around computers so they can't help me. So don't think I'm a noob by not knowing much
thats all. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got SupCom and my computer can&#8217;t play it. I have a Gateway Vista thats not bad, but I need a better video card that can play SupCom, thats all. It&#8217;s the only game I have that it can&#8217;t play, and my computer keeps telling me I need a new video card. I&#8217;m still young and don&#8217;t know a hole lot about computers like you people do and was wondering what kind of Video Card I can get that at least not glich when you play SupCom. I don&#8217;t have too bad of a income. whats your sugjestion? My parents didn&#8217;t grow up around computers so they can&#8217;t help me. So don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m a noob by not knowing much<br />
thats all. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drizzt321</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>Drizzt321</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-323</guid>
		<description>There is a slight error in your description. Its PCI Express, or in short form, PCIe or PCI-E. There is a _huge_ difference between PCI-X and PCI-E. PCI-X is generally associated with server and workstations and is based on the old PCI standard. PCI Express is a wholely new standard and is far superior.

Just thought I'd point that out for anybody who is a n00b at building computer so they don't get too confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a slight error in your description. Its PCI Express, or in short form, PCIe or PCI-E. There is a _huge_ difference between PCI-X and PCI-E. PCI-X is generally associated with server and workstations and is based on the old PCI standard. PCI Express is a wholely new standard and is far superior.</p>
<p>Just thought I&#8217;d point that out for anybody who is a n00b at building computer so they don&#8217;t get too confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyde Weys</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyde Weys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Hrmmm, that is confusing.  Time to choose more unique screen names I suppose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hrmmm, that is confusing.  Time to choose more unique screen names I suppose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-240</guid>
		<description>I didn't realize that there were two Wills posting comments...  That was a little confusing at first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t realize that there were two Wills posting comments&#8230;  That was a little confusing at first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuker</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Intel C2D pwns AMD, they are laggin behind alot now, they needto get K8L out very soon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intel C2D pwns AMD, they are laggin behind alot now, they needto get K8L out very soon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vreenak</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Vreenak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 03:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot Will! You've saved me a future growl / headache for sure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot Will! You&#8217;ve saved me a future growl / headache for sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Fair enough.  &lt;a href="http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=60416" rel="nofollow"&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; is the link for Intel Core Duo processors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough.  <a href="http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=60416" rel="nofollow">This</a> is the link for Intel Core Duo processors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vreenak</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Vreenak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Great. Looks like I've got a wee bit of research to do to prepare myself for my next hurdle. :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great. Looks like I&#8217;ve got a wee bit of research to do to prepare myself for my next hurdle. :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyde Weys</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyde Weys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Vreenak: Not at all.  It looks like that link is specific to dual core Athlon processors.  There are similar tips out there for Intel's Core 2 Duo, of course, but this ain't it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vreenak: Not at all.  It looks like that link is specific to dual core Athlon processors.  There are similar tips out there for Intel&#8217;s Core 2 Duo, of course, but this ain&#8217;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vreenak</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Vreenak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/09/the-best-bang-for-your-buck-newb-this-may-be-for-you/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Thanks Will! You say these drivers, although made by AMD will apply to Intel's as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Will! You say these drivers, although made by AMD will apply to Intel&#8217;s as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
