http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/18/how-to-defeat-a-turtle/ Transporting our ACUs to your base since 2007 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:57:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/18/how-to-defeat-a-turtle/comment-page-1/#comment-442 Cyde Weys Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:15:59 +0000 http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/18/how-to-defeat-a-turtle/#comment-442 Absolutely. Tech 2 artillery is noticeably inaccurate. In the time it takes mobile artillery to crack base shields, the defender would be lucky to kill even a few of the attackers with tech 2 artillery. Mobile artillery firing out from underneath shields would actually be a much, much more effective counter. As would having a defensive army ready to sally forth and engage the attackers in close combat. Gunships do a good job of this, and have the advantage of being able to respond more quickly than, say, siege bots. Or, even better, just a few strategic bombers can demolish any sized land army that doesn't have good anti-air protection. Absolutely. Tech 2 artillery is noticeably inaccurate. In the time it takes mobile artillery to crack base shields, the defender would be lucky to kill even a few of the attackers with tech 2 artillery. Mobile artillery firing out from underneath shields would actually be a much, much more effective counter. As would having a defensive army ready to sally forth and engage the attackers in close combat. Gunships do a good job of this, and have the advantage of being able to respond more quickly than, say, siege bots. Or, even better, just a few strategic bombers can demolish any sized land army that doesn’t have good anti-air protection.

]]> http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/18/how-to-defeat-a-turtle/comment-page-1/#comment-441 Baughn Tue, 03 Apr 2007 14:40:10 +0000 http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/18/how-to-defeat-a-turtle/#comment-441 T3 mobile artillery is has a longer range than point defences, but noticably shorter than T2 artilery. Although the latter costs more, would they truly be that useful in cracking a shield while sitting there under artillery fire? T3 mobile artillery is has a longer range than point defences, but noticably shorter than T2 artilery. Although the latter costs more, would they truly be that useful in cracking a shield while sitting there under artillery fire?

]]>