<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More confirmed news about the patch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/</link>
	<description>Transporting our ACUs to your base since 2007</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:57:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cyde Weys</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyde Weys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/#comment-1369</guid>
		<description>Actually, I&#039;m hoping that the testers do find the unbalances &lt;tt&gt;:-P&lt;/tt&gt;

We don&#039;t want a repeat of what happened to Aeon this last patch cycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I&#8217;m hoping that the testers do find the unbalances <tt>:-P</tt></p>
<p>We don&#8217;t want a repeat of what happened to Aeon this last patch cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hipsu</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-1364</link>
		<dc:creator>Hipsu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/#comment-1364</guid>
		<description>Hopefully testers don&#039;t find unbalancies. That would lead to more tuning and more testing. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully testers don&#8217;t find unbalancies. That would lead to more tuning and more testing. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryuken</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryuken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/#comment-1360</guid>
		<description>That is some good news, hopefully it won&#039;t take another 4 weeks now to be released. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is some good news, hopefully it won&#8217;t take another 4 weeks now to be released. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jotto</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-1353</link>
		<dc:creator>Jotto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/#comment-1353</guid>
		<description>&quot;I am surprised it took this long to leak lol&quot; 
This long?

Hell most people have known it since the testing started. I knew far before because certain mappers *coughdarkcough* shouted to the high heavens that they had been chosen to test the Official Map Maker. Only reason I didn&#039;t make a post on here specifically about it was that I thought it was common knowledge o.O

Anyhoo, its not really worth arguing over what balance changes are necessary, as the changes have already been made. Save your arguing until after the patch is released :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I am surprised it took this long to leak lol&#8221;<br />
This long?</p>
<p>Hell most people have known it since the testing started. I knew far before because certain mappers *coughdarkcough* shouted to the high heavens that they had been chosen to test the Official Map Maker. Only reason I didn&#8217;t make a post on here specifically about it was that I thought it was common knowledge o.O</p>
<p>Anyhoo, its not really worth arguing over what balance changes are necessary, as the changes have already been made. Save your arguing until after the patch is released :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unconquerable</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-1351</link>
		<dc:creator>Unconquerable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/#comment-1351</guid>
		<description>I am surprised it took this long to leak lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised it took this long to leak lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molloy</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-1350</link>
		<dc:creator>Molloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/#comment-1350</guid>
		<description>Making T3 more expensive isn&#039;t necessarily such a good thing. What if it drags everything out more? I thought they should have simply made it more powerful. People seem to complain the game is too slow (in the early stages) already. We just need to hurry people going to t2. Not slow them from going to T3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Making T3 more expensive isn&#8217;t necessarily such a good thing. What if it drags everything out more? I thought they should have simply made it more powerful. People seem to complain the game is too slow (in the early stages) already. We just need to hurry people going to t2. Not slow them from going to T3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wuped</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-1347</link>
		<dc:creator>Wuped</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/#comment-1347</guid>
		<description>Ohhh mysterious sources, the plot thickens DUN DUN DUN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhh mysterious sources, the plot thickens DUN DUN DUN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyde Weys</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-1341</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyde Weys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/#comment-1341</guid>
		<description>Interceptor: The source is my &quot;sources&quot;.  Obviously the person(s) who told me about the ongoing test server shall remain nameless, because it&#039;s under a veil of secrecy.  I couldn&#039;t get any of them to tell me what the upcoming changes so far in the test patch &lt;em&gt;were&lt;/em&gt;; I merely got confirmation of the test server&#039;s existence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interceptor: The source is my &#8220;sources&#8221;.  Obviously the person(s) who told me about the ongoing test server shall remain nameless, because it&#8217;s under a veil of secrecy.  I couldn&#8217;t get any of them to tell me what the upcoming changes so far in the test patch <em>were</em>; I merely got confirmation of the test server&#8217;s existence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wuped</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator>Wuped</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>Sweetness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweetness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/comment-page-1/#comment-1339</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/25/more-confirmed-news-about-the-patch/#comment-1339</guid>
		<description>awesome, i look forward to T3 taking longer to appear! T2 is so underutilized and yet has such great ground units that should be mainstay components of every land war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome, i look forward to T3 taking longer to appear! T2 is so underutilized and yet has such great ground units that should be mainstay components of every land war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

