<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are the factions still imbalanced?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/</link>
	<description>Transporting our ACUs to your base since 2007</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:53:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: falcon1970</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/comment-page-1/#comment-2566</link>
		<dc:creator>falcon1970</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 11:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/#comment-2566</guid>
		<description>Someone explain to me this Aeon==OP on WD before the patch?  I took a tip from most of the TOP players (of which I am NOT even remotely close, just stating what I&#039;ve seen/read) who, while most play Aeon by default will swear by the UEF Lobos (T1 Mobile Artillery) on WD.    (think of Unconq in the early challenge match).  The Oblivion (Aeon T2 PD) might rule, but if you can&#039;t get to the hill, or anywhere near it because of all the Lobos, what&#039;s the point? Maybe I got lucky and played newbs every time I played WD as UEF (I always play &#039;random&#039;), but I either owned, or it was a good fight, and never do I remember thinking &quot;wow, Aeon are OP on WD&quot;.  In fact, if anything but UEF pops up for me when I&#039;m on WD, I normally frown. Again, I&#039;m not a great player, but I do have over 200+ games under my belt (about 56% wins), and while I see the aeon advantage on a lot of maps, WD was not one of them.

I&#039;m not sure if I haven&#039;t played enough since the patch or what, but I do think the Cybran have gotten a boost. I&#039;m sure some of it is &#039;luck of the ranked draw&#039;, but lately Cybran have been eating me up.  I think I need to go back and play like 20 ranked games as UEF, then Cybran, then Aeon, and then go back to random.  It&#039;s tough to learn the nuances when you keep switching every other game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone explain to me this Aeon==OP on WD before the patch?  I took a tip from most of the TOP players (of which I am NOT even remotely close, just stating what I&#8217;ve seen/read) who, while most play Aeon by default will swear by the UEF Lobos (T1 Mobile Artillery) on WD.    (think of Unconq in the early challenge match).  The Oblivion (Aeon T2 PD) might rule, but if you can&#8217;t get to the hill, or anywhere near it because of all the Lobos, what&#8217;s the point? Maybe I got lucky and played newbs every time I played WD as UEF (I always play &#8216;random&#8217;), but I either owned, or it was a good fight, and never do I remember thinking &#8220;wow, Aeon are OP on WD&#8221;.  In fact, if anything but UEF pops up for me when I&#8217;m on WD, I normally frown. Again, I&#8217;m not a great player, but I do have over 200+ games under my belt (about 56% wins), and while I see the aeon advantage on a lot of maps, WD was not one of them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if I haven&#8217;t played enough since the patch or what, but I do think the Cybran have gotten a boost. I&#8217;m sure some of it is &#8216;luck of the ranked draw&#8217;, but lately Cybran have been eating me up.  I think I need to go back and play like 20 ranked games as UEF, then Cybran, then Aeon, and then go back to random.  It&#8217;s tough to learn the nuances when you keep switching every other game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Djinn</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/comment-page-1/#comment-2564</link>
		<dc:creator>Djinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 09:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/#comment-2564</guid>
		<description>Of course, it still is imbalanced. Such things take months, even YEARS to balance...

I agree with Cauldr0n by the way. 80% of the stuff people post about imba, isn&#039;t imba at all, they just don&#039;t know how to counter it or efficiently use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, it still is imbalanced. Such things take months, even YEARS to balance&#8230;</p>
<p>I agree with Cauldr0n by the way. 80% of the stuff people post about imba, isn&#8217;t imba at all, they just don&#8217;t know how to counter it or efficiently use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: werd</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/comment-page-1/#comment-2554</link>
		<dc:creator>werd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 02:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/#comment-2554</guid>
		<description>The T1 tank for UEF is pretty strong relative to its T1 tank opponents and T2 tank seems decent. Maybe they could use a small bump to their anti-air units&#039; effectiveness but then I wonder what would separate them from Cybran.

Perhaps it&#039;s best to have each race with strengths and weaknesses so that going into a given map you pick one that you feel best suits your playing strengths and preferences while taking into account the terrain on which you&#039;re fighting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The T1 tank for UEF is pretty strong relative to its T1 tank opponents and T2 tank seems decent. Maybe they could use a small bump to their anti-air units&#8217; effectiveness but then I wonder what would separate them from Cybran.</p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s best to have each race with strengths and weaknesses so that going into a given map you pick one that you feel best suits your playing strengths and preferences while taking into account the terrain on which you&#8217;re fighting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cauldr0n</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/comment-page-1/#comment-2548</link>
		<dc:creator>Cauldr0n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 21:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/#comment-2548</guid>
		<description>Writing the current meta game down is always something really hard. I believe a lot of the unbalance cries come from people who play their factions the wrong way. For example Cybran is a harrasment race designed to strike and run and should never engage equal aoen or UEF force&#039;s head on.  But their units do stick together the best making em more effecient. Where aeon and uef trickle in and that leads me to believe people need to learn how to use formation move. A simple way is to simply hold ctrl and rightclick. This issue a formation move in the last formation type used. So a line formation remains a line formation, square remains square etc.. 

So for short Aeon is the slow advancing front, UEF the powerfull fist, Cybran small stabs all along the line before bundling in to kill the crippled. So their lies the main problem with most aeons and uefs the let them self get crippled on maps like open palms.  

BTW on Winters duel UEF with the lobo was always considered the powerhouse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Writing the current meta game down is always something really hard. I believe a lot of the unbalance cries come from people who play their factions the wrong way. For example Cybran is a harrasment race designed to strike and run and should never engage equal aoen or UEF force&#8217;s head on.  But their units do stick together the best making em more effecient. Where aeon and uef trickle in and that leads me to believe people need to learn how to use formation move. A simple way is to simply hold ctrl and rightclick. This issue a formation move in the last formation type used. So a line formation remains a line formation, square remains square etc.. </p>
<p>So for short Aeon is the slow advancing front, UEF the powerfull fist, Cybran small stabs all along the line before bundling in to kill the crippled. So their lies the main problem with most aeons and uefs the let them self get crippled on maps like open palms.  </p>
<p>BTW on Winters duel UEF with the lobo was always considered the powerhouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grokmoo</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/comment-page-1/#comment-2546</link>
		<dc:creator>Grokmoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 20:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/#comment-2546</guid>
		<description>T2A:

I would argue that the old Oblivion was the best point defense against large attacks, too.  While it would have trouble hitting small numbers of siege bots, the Oblivion was the best PD in the late game, because not only did it do by far the most damage to experimentals, its substantial splash damage allowed it to rape siege bots in large numbers.

I would also argue it worked better than ok on winter duel.  Basically, because of its very high DPS, another faction would need to spend several times more than an Aeon faction to put a T2 point defense on the middle hill under fire.  If you are Aeon and your opponent is not, getting a single oblivion on that hill basically secures it from enemy T2 PD.  If you are Cybran, it is very possible (and not all that difficult) for your Aeon opponent to start a T2 PD after you have already built yours, and still take out your PD with hit points to spare.  This made securing the vital middle ground very difficult for non-Aeon players.  Couple this with the Aeon&#039;s perfect tactical missile defense, and the Aeon were clearly dominant on that map before the patch.

Finally, I agree that some factions will be better for some maps than others.  The point of this post is to ask whether a single faction is substantially better than the others in general (on many different kinds of maps).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T2A:</p>
<p>I would argue that the old Oblivion was the best point defense against large attacks, too.  While it would have trouble hitting small numbers of siege bots, the Oblivion was the best PD in the late game, because not only did it do by far the most damage to experimentals, its substantial splash damage allowed it to rape siege bots in large numbers.</p>
<p>I would also argue it worked better than ok on winter duel.  Basically, because of its very high DPS, another faction would need to spend several times more than an Aeon faction to put a T2 point defense on the middle hill under fire.  If you are Aeon and your opponent is not, getting a single oblivion on that hill basically secures it from enemy T2 PD.  If you are Cybran, it is very possible (and not all that difficult) for your Aeon opponent to start a T2 PD after you have already built yours, and still take out your PD with hit points to spare.  This made securing the vital middle ground very difficult for non-Aeon players.  Couple this with the Aeon&#8217;s perfect tactical missile defense, and the Aeon were clearly dominant on that map before the patch.</p>
<p>Finally, I agree that some factions will be better for some maps than others.  The point of this post is to ask whether a single faction is substantially better than the others in general (on many different kinds of maps).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T2A`</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/comment-page-1/#comment-2545</link>
		<dc:creator>T2A`</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 19:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/#comment-2545</guid>
		<description>Forgot to put this in there, but different maps will give different factions an advantage in some manner.  This is normal.  A one-faction, one-map game is dumb but it seems to be what people want.  Open Palms, for example, has all that empty space in two corners accessible by transport only.  Cybran is the only faction with mobile stealth so they&#039;re the only ones that can effectively build firebases up there.  Should we nerf the Cybran for that?  I think not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to put this in there, but different maps will give different factions an advantage in some manner.  This is normal.  A one-faction, one-map game is dumb but it seems to be what people want.  Open Palms, for example, has all that empty space in two corners accessible by transport only.  Cybran is the only faction with mobile stealth so they&#8217;re the only ones that can effectively build firebases up there.  Should we nerf the Cybran for that?  I think not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T2A`</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/comment-page-1/#comment-2543</link>
		<dc:creator>T2A`</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 19:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/#comment-2543</guid>
		<description>Just because you don&#039;t like or agree with how something works does not mean it&#039;s imbalanced.  The old Oblivion, for example.  It sucks in most cases because it couldn&#039;t hit anything that was moving, but because it worked okay on WD it&#039;s suddenly OP?  You can&#039;t have it both ways.  All this whining is eventually going to turn SupCom into a one-faction game as GPG patches and nerfs everything to the point that every faction is identical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because you don&#8217;t like or agree with how something works does not mean it&#8217;s imbalanced.  The old Oblivion, for example.  It sucks in most cases because it couldn&#8217;t hit anything that was moving, but because it worked okay on WD it&#8217;s suddenly OP?  You can&#8217;t have it both ways.  All this whining is eventually going to turn SupCom into a one-faction game as GPG patches and nerfs everything to the point that every faction is identical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wuped</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/comment-page-1/#comment-2539</link>
		<dc:creator>Wuped</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 17:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/#comment-2539</guid>
		<description>Errr Winter Duel a weak point for Cybran? I think not, I play Cybran and constantly thumbs up WD. And I would not say UEF is underpowered I have actually heard a few people whining that it is overpowered due to good t2 tanks and such(which is stupid).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Errr Winter Duel a weak point for Cybran? I think not, I play Cybran and constantly thumbs up WD. And I would not say UEF is underpowered I have actually heard a few people whining that it is overpowered due to good t2 tanks and such(which is stupid).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brn4meplz</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/comment-page-1/#comment-2538</link>
		<dc:creator>Brn4meplz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 16:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/29/are-the-factions-still-imbalanced/#comment-2538</guid>
		<description>I think alot of people are in a phase right now after the patch update where they think Aeon sucks. When in reality they are essentially the same as before(a few economic changes, maybe a top speed lowered here or there) but most of their changes were bringing their units in line with others. I still find Aurora&#039;s to be killer units. I play UEF exclusively and although the Striker has the worst speed and acceleration it is cheap, strong and effective. Newer/mediocre cybran players are still complaining about the TML-4 being balanced with UEF/Aeon. But with the reductions in cost of some of their units and the increased effectiveness of things like T3 bots(especially now that many players use more Mobile Missile launchers now) and their ability to out tech anyone else with low upgrade costs and the mantis Assist ability they are quite deadly. 

So yes I think the factions are fairly balanced(UEF and cybran T3 planes do have issues, and a Mavor still = gg[if you ever get one *Cough* custom games]) but it is certainly a good adjustment from what it was</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think alot of people are in a phase right now after the patch update where they think Aeon sucks. When in reality they are essentially the same as before(a few economic changes, maybe a top speed lowered here or there) but most of their changes were bringing their units in line with others. I still find Aurora&#8217;s to be killer units. I play UEF exclusively and although the Striker has the worst speed and acceleration it is cheap, strong and effective. Newer/mediocre cybran players are still complaining about the TML-4 being balanced with UEF/Aeon. But with the reductions in cost of some of their units and the increased effectiveness of things like T3 bots(especially now that many players use more Mobile Missile launchers now) and their ability to out tech anyone else with low upgrade costs and the mantis Assist ability they are quite deadly. </p>
<p>So yes I think the factions are fairly balanced(UEF and cybran T3 planes do have issues, and a Mavor still = gg[if you ever get one *Cough* custom games]) but it is certainly a good adjustment from what it was</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
