<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2v2 ladder reset imminent?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/</link>
	<description>Transporting our ACUs to your base since 2007</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:12:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Meddish</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-3373</link>
		<dc:creator>Meddish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/#comment-3373</guid>
		<description>well maby not a reset maby a re-calcuation.... but i cant realy say that not knowing what is in the patch.... and the search REALY needs to be fixed.... cuz i dont know what team mate ive plaid more with!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well maby not a reset maby a re-calcuation&#8230;. but i cant realy say that not knowing what is in the patch&#8230;. and the search REALY needs to be fixed&#8230;. cuz i dont know what team mate ive plaid more with!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyde Weys</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-3357</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyde Weys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/#comment-3357</guid>
		<description>Agreed.  It&#039;s kind of weird that you have to search on both names to get the listing to show up.  I really wish it would work where you could just put in your own name and it&#039;d show you every listing you have in the 2v2 ranking ladder with all of your various partners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  It&#8217;s kind of weird that you have to search on both names to get the listing to show up.  I really wish it would work where you could just put in your own name and it&#8217;d show you every listing you have in the 2v2 ranking ladder with all of your various partners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T2A`</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-3356</link>
		<dc:creator>T2A`</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/#comment-3356</guid>
		<description>Actually, I did not know that.  So, maybe we are in there after all.  D:

gg usability.  GPG needs to hire some guy with who knows about HCI and GUI design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I did not know that.  So, maybe we are in there after all.  D:</p>
<p>gg usability.  GPG needs to hire some guy with who knows about HCI and GUI design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyde Weys</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-3355</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyde Weys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/#comment-3355</guid>
		<description>T2A`: Are you sure?  You know you have to search the 2v2 rankings ladder on both of your names, separated by a space, in lexigraphical order, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T2A`: Are you sure?  You know you have to search the 2v2 rankings ladder on both of your names, separated by a space, in lexigraphical order, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T2A`</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-3352</link>
		<dc:creator>T2A`</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/#comment-3352</guid>
		<description>I played four 2v2 ranked games, all with the same partner, and our names never showed up in the rankings anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I played four 2v2 ranked games, all with the same partner, and our names never showed up in the rankings anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theShiznit</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-3340</link>
		<dc:creator>theShiznit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/#comment-3340</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m against it personally.  It really will not serve the purpose.  Keeping current ladder will allow current top players to remain on top.  It would be frustrating if i had to fight my way to the top (if i was anywhere near it of course)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m against it personally.  It really will not serve the purpose.  Keeping current ladder will allow current top players to remain on top.  It would be frustrating if i had to fight my way to the top (if i was anywhere near it of course)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyde Weys</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-3338</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyde Weys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/#comment-3338</guid>
		<description>Huh, I&#039;m surprised that more people are in favor of this than I would have guessed.  That&#039;s what polls are for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh, I&#8217;m surprised that more people are in favor of this than I would have guessed.  That&#8217;s what polls are for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theShiznit</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-3337</link>
		<dc:creator>theShiznit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/#comment-3337</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m guessing the reset would take place within weeks rather than months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m guessing the reset would take place within weeks rather than months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baddox</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-3330</link>
		<dc:creator>Baddox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/#comment-3330</guid>
		<description>I think as long as they give PLENTY of warning to an exact reset date, there shouldn&#039;t be that many complaints.  They need to give probably at least a couple of months&#039; warning though, just so people won&#039;t try extra hard to get their rank up right before the reset.  I guess this would have the negative effect of people not playing in the months leading up to the reset.  But if they&#039;re convinced the game has changed enough to warrant a reset, it probably needs to be done sometime.  I&#039;m sure the top players could and would quickly re-establish themselves anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think as long as they give PLENTY of warning to an exact reset date, there shouldn&#8217;t be that many complaints.  They need to give probably at least a couple of months&#8217; warning though, just so people won&#8217;t try extra hard to get their rank up right before the reset.  I guess this would have the negative effect of people not playing in the months leading up to the reset.  But if they&#8217;re convinced the game has changed enough to warrant a reset, it probably needs to be done sometime.  I&#8217;m sure the top players could and would quickly re-establish themselves anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryuken</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-3314</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryuken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/15/2v2-ladder-reset-imminent/#comment-3314</guid>
		<description>Resets are fine, maybe that the current position should be stored for that &quot;Look what I achieved before the reset&quot;-showing-off-kind-of-people. Besides, 2vs2 has been (still is?) more two times 1vs1 than anything else due to poor starting positions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Resets are fine, maybe that the current position should be stored for that &#8220;Look what I achieved before the reset&#8221;-showing-off-kind-of-people. Besides, 2vs2 has been (still is?) more two times 1vs1 than anything else due to poor starting positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
