<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SupCom YouTube video roundup part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/09/supcom-youtube-video-roundup-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/09/supcom-youtube-video-roundup-part-2/</link>
	<description>Forging new Alliances daily</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: T2A`</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/09/supcom-youtube-video-roundup-part-2/#comment-4719</link>
		<dc:creator>T2A`</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/09/supcom-youtube-video-roundup-part-2/#comment-4719</guid>
		<description>This doesn't seem quite right.

1 Soul Ripper = 18000 hp, 20000 mass, 500000 energy, 15000 build time, 300 dps
8 Broadswords = 3800 hp, 16800 mass, 180000 energy, 36000 build time, 1312 dps

Are you telling me THREE Broadswords take almost as much time to build as a Soul Ripper?  WTF.  Where's that "balance" GPG keeps talking about?  In the time it takes to build eight Broadswords you can build two SRs, assuming you have the economy for it, and 36000 health to cut through is no small matter.  I guess the low DPS on the SR is the balance, but still...  :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This doesn&#8217;t seem quite right.</p>
<p>1 Soul Ripper = 18000 hp, 20000 mass, 500000 energy, 15000 build time, 300 dps<br />
8 Broadswords = 3800 hp, 16800 mass, 180000 energy, 36000 build time, 1312 dps</p>
<p>Are you telling me THREE Broadswords take almost as much time to build as a Soul Ripper?  WTF.  Where&#8217;s that &#8220;balance&#8221; GPG keeps talking about?  In the time it takes to build eight Broadswords you can build two SRs, assuming you have the economy for it, and 36000 health to cut through is no small matter.  I guess the low DPS on the SR is the balance, but still&#8230;  :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wuped</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/09/supcom-youtube-video-roundup-part-2/#comment-4713</link>
		<dc:creator>Wuped</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/09/supcom-youtube-video-roundup-part-2/#comment-4713</guid>
		<description>Laconic, the cost of broadswords is immense. To put it into perspective a soul ripper costs as much as 8 broadswords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laconic, the cost of broadswords is immense. To put it into perspective a soul ripper costs as much as 8 broadswords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kaizer</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/09/supcom-youtube-video-roundup-part-2/#comment-4711</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kaizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/09/supcom-youtube-video-roundup-part-2/#comment-4711</guid>
		<description>oh and I think deformable terrain would be a really good addition, not being able to build on a spot because it is now a crater from artillery/ a nuke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh and I think deformable terrain would be a really good addition, not being able to build on a spot because it is now a crater from artillery/ a nuke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Kaizer</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/09/supcom-youtube-video-roundup-part-2/#comment-4710</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Kaizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/09/supcom-youtube-video-roundup-part-2/#comment-4710</guid>
		<description>Hello, Sear here with a recent name change :), I think these videos are pretty good but the feel project remains my fave, out of these I'd have to say the nuke mod is the coolest, if the nukes were really like that they'd be alot better, much more like real nukes (Although still nothing in comparison)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Sear here with a recent name change :), I think these videos are pretty good but the feel project remains my fave, out of these I&#8217;d have to say the nuke mod is the coolest, if the nukes were really like that they&#8217;d be alot better, much more like real nukes (Although still nothing in comparison)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laconic Youth</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/09/supcom-youtube-video-roundup-part-2/#comment-4693</link>
		<dc:creator>Laconic Youth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 03:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/09/supcom-youtube-video-roundup-part-2/#comment-4693</guid>
		<description>Isn't T3 mobile artillery a little expensive to use as AA?  i guess it will have to be factored into cost/benefit because it could be considered dual use.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t T3 mobile artillery a little expensive to use as AA?  i guess it will have to be factored into cost/benefit because it could be considered dual use&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
