<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New units coming at the end of the month</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/17/new-units-coming-at-the-end-of-the-month/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/17/new-units-coming-at-the-end-of-the-month/</link>
	<description>Forging new Alliances daily</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MeDDIsH</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/17/new-units-coming-at-the-end-of-the-month/#comment-4987</link>
		<dc:creator>MeDDIsH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/17/new-units-coming-at-the-end-of-the-month/#comment-4987</guid>
		<description>id like to see a LONG range tatical missle... with high damage.... (and a defense to go with it)

not to mention ive seen it as a modded unit on the forums a seige shield nice BIG shield needs like 10K energy to run it... but can be taken down with T3 arty and firebases takeing around 2 min to recharge and come online again (also it didnt recharge after being damaged) and planes few under it

and a T3 mobile missile launcher (that cybran SABS cant intercept)

thats about all my wishes i think</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>id like to see a LONG range tatical missle&#8230; with high damage&#8230;. (and a defense to go with it)</p>
<p>not to mention ive seen it as a modded unit on the forums a seige shield nice BIG shield needs like 10K energy to run it&#8230; but can be taken down with T3 arty and firebases takeing around 2 min to recharge and come online again (also it didnt recharge after being damaged) and planes few under it</p>
<p>and a T3 mobile missile launcher (that cybran SABS cant intercept)</p>
<p>thats about all my wishes i think</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axf</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/17/new-units-coming-at-the-end-of-the-month/#comment-4977</link>
		<dc:creator>axf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 04:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/17/new-units-coming-at-the-end-of-the-month/#comment-4977</guid>
		<description>As for my personal opinion, I think that lowering the unit diversity across the tech levels is not a good idea. In the extreme case it could lead to the situation, when units from the next tech level replace almost all units from the previous tech level because of the nearly same functionality. That will definitely make the game more plain and simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for my personal opinion, I think that lowering the unit diversity across the tech levels is not a good idea. In the extreme case it could lead to the situation, when units from the next tech level replace almost all units from the previous tech level because of the nearly same functionality. That will definitely make the game more plain and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molloy</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/17/new-units-coming-at-the-end-of-the-month/#comment-4969</link>
		<dc:creator>Molloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/17/new-units-coming-at-the-end-of-the-month/#comment-4969</guid>
		<description>If the Seraphim are getting a t3 bomber in the expansion then one of the other sides getting a t2 bomber is hardly going to be game breaking. If we've learnt anything from Supreme Commander so far anyway is that it tends to suffer from different balance issues. TA was always perhaps overly aggressive and didn't have enough teching. SC isn't aggressive enough and there's too much teching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Seraphim are getting a t3 bomber in the expansion then one of the other sides getting a t2 bomber is hardly going to be game breaking. If we&#8217;ve learnt anything from Supreme Commander so far anyway is that it tends to suffer from different balance issues. TA was always perhaps overly aggressive and didn&#8217;t have enough teching. SC isn&#8217;t aggressive enough and there&#8217;s too much teching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyde Weys</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/17/new-units-coming-at-the-end-of-the-month/#comment-4968</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyde Weys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/17/new-units-coming-at-the-end-of-the-month/#comment-4968</guid>
		<description>Woot, I &lt;a href="http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/29/official-unit-downloads-coming-august-1/" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;b&gt;predicted this way back in June&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  Color me very happy that new official units are coming out before the expansion.  A tech 2 fighter/bomber though, eh?  That seems like it could very easily be either overpowered or so weak it doesn't deserve being used (like amphibious tanks).  I would've preferred more T3 units myself, but I guess those are coming in the expansion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woot, I <a href="http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/06/29/official-unit-downloads-coming-august-1/" rel="nofollow"><b>predicted this way back in June</b></a>.  Color me very happy that new official units are coming out before the expansion.  A tech 2 fighter/bomber though, eh?  That seems like it could very easily be either overpowered or so weak it doesn&#8217;t deserve being used (like amphibious tanks).  I would&#8217;ve preferred more T3 units myself, but I guess those are coming in the expansion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
