<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Supreme Commander Talk &#187; commander</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.supcomtalk.com/tag/commander/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com</link>
	<description>Transporting our ACUs to your base since 2007</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:03:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The great commander death nuke controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/18/the-commander-death-nuke-controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/18/the-commander-death-nuke-controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cyde Weys</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multiplayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death nuke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPGNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Commander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unconquerable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/18/the-commander-death-nuke-controversy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As some of you may remember, the commander death nuke used to do the full 70,000 nuclear explosion damage in beta and early retail versions.  It was quickly reduced to a mere 4,000 damage (while keeping the now-ridiculously large explosion intact) to balance the game.  The old 70,000 damage made it much too [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/07/18/the-commander-death-nuke-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keeping your commander safe</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/12/keeping-your-commander-safe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/12/keeping-your-commander-safe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 04:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cyde Weys</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multiplayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Replays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firebase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loyalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[siege assault bot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Commander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turtle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/12/keeping-your-commander-safe/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I cannot reiterate enough how important it is to keep your commander safe (in assassination games, anyway).  At around the ten minute mark your commander needs to come off the front lines and head to safety, because your opponent will be gunning for him.  If you are within tactical missile range of your [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/12/keeping-your-commander-safe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assassination: the only way to play</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/17/assassination-the-only-way-to-play/</link>
		<comments>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/17/assassination-the-only-way-to-play/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cyde Weys</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multiplayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assassination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supremacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Commander]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/17/assassination-the-only-way-to-play/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Expert players will tell you that the assassination victory mode is the only way to play Supreme Commander.  The sole exception is if you are for some reason playing against the AI, in which case you probably want to play supremacy, because the AI is notoriously bad about even trying to keep its commander [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/04/17/assassination-the-only-way-to-play/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

