<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Supreme Commander Talk &#187; mech marine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.supcomtalk.com/tag/mech-marine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com</link>
	<description>Transporting our ACUs to your base since 2007</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:03:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Some mech marines on a stroll</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/01/some-mech-marines-on-a-stroll/</link>
		<comments>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/01/some-mech-marines-on-a-stroll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 03:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cyde Weys</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leisure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mech marine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Commander]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/01/some-mech-marines-on-a-stroll/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are just some simply named mech marines out on a nice, quiet stroll through the wilderness of Supreme Commander.  Nothing to see here; move along.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/05/01/some-mech-marines-on-a-stroll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Veterancy really doesn&#8217;t do anything</title>
		<link>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/15/veterancy-really-doesnt-do-anything/</link>
		<comments>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/15/veterancy-really-doesnt-do-anything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 03:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cyde Weys</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artillery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kill count]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mech marine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nerf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[play balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Commander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torpedo bomber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Total Annihilation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veteran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterancy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/15/veterancy-really-doesnt-do-anything/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Veterancy had the potential to impact gameplay in Supreme Commander, but unfortunately, it was &#8220;play balanced&#8221; out to the point of utter meaningless.  Back in Total Annihilation, units received veteran status after five kills, and they became noticeably better.  Artillery would shoot more accurately, tanks would deal more damage (I think), etc.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supcomtalk.com/2007/03/15/veterancy-really-doesnt-do-anything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

